The DTP injustice.

The DTP injustice. Approximately two years ago over a period that the Supreme Court Republican Chief Prosecutor Abdurrahman Yalcinkaya on 16.11.2007, the Democratic Society Party (DTP) closure case at the Constitutional Court opened with the demand. This case ended on December 11, 2009. And this court decided to close about DTP. This decision of ECHR decisions against iştahatlarına a decision, so the legal and political as well not nice. Political parties in the country immediately Kannatimce law changes must be made, these changes are made, choice should be lowered to five percent threshold. Decision of the Constitutional Court first Nediyor a brief look at him let's interpretation. "Supreme Court Chief Prosecutor of the Republic 16/11/2007 daily, SP.135. Hz. 2007 / 2 dated with the indictment of the Democratic Society Party want closure was thought to discuss whether the Democratic Society Party, actions by connection to the terrorist organization also evaluates the territory of the State of and the indivisible integrity of the nation against acts of nature became a focus of the business was understood that it was, 68th and 69th articles of the Constitution and Political Parties Act No. 2820 in accordance with article 101 and 103 to be turned OFF, ....... etc " I think this decision to the Constitutional Court, which must be heard cat has damaged legal respect. This decision, I have seen very promising for our country during the democratic opening, as I am an absolute step backwards. 98 of the Law on Political Parties with Article 33 of Law No. 2949 article in the party closure case, indicate CMUK'nın apply. Legislators, security principles of criminal law of political parties were also expected to benefit. However, the Constitutional Court, the decision in question, the defendant deprived of political parties which DTPyi this assurance, as the closure of political parties on the principles of the Venice Commission have not been evaluated kararinda. But the closure of the party causing the alleged statements and actions of party deputies and deputies of the lower closure of the party who caused the alleged statements and actions, including founding members for a period of five years has brought the ban on politics. When you decide you do not ever scared of God, or why you can not be objective? Say that your third-ranking of the decision, "Representations and actions that cause the closure of the Party and Diyarbakir Mardin deputy Ahmet Turkish Deputy of the Parliament of Aysel Tugluk, 84 of the Constitution The last paragraph of the reasoned decision in accordance with article published in the Official Gazette on the date to the end ".... etc, it was decided. Now obliged to ask people you do not want you to stay, or from Turkey Dear Mr. Ahmet Aysel Tugluk than unifying, who struggle every day for peace and democracy, this country at least until we have a seven MPs? Deciding the Radikal newspaper Mr. Aysel Tugluk Did you read the article? Why these people their political rights mahrumettiniz? As far as I understand the decision to close the DTP, the European Human Rights Court in Strasbourg will move to the agenda. Therefore be helpful to know already, you provide the wrong decision from the Court will return. In a constitutional state of law must be secure. State authorities in fulfilling their duty "rule of law" should not lose the quality of law in civilized countries adopted the basic principles must be kept constantly in mind. What about you the closure of political parties in this context principles of the Venice Commission why your decision reviews? State trust, wants to ensure rule of law as a result of a peaceful and stable environment emerges. Otherwise chaos environment arises. Cause of the chaos that no one should arise. DTP's closure was certain consequences, no internal pressure not pain, bunaları court and legislators would have to see the advance. DTP Kurdish issue and shut down brought this problem is not solved problem. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan on 20/11/2007 at group meetings in his speech said, "Our approach, in democracy and constitutional intimidation in order to comply with everyone in the democratic system is to keep. To achieve this, the us, is the duty of the political." In this context, legislators and shutdown of the government party would have to make difficult zamanın'da laws. not to make a political lack of legal regulations, this time as I am. This deficiency must be corrected immediately. "Remedial legislation, but is the law, is right, is consciousness. law is changed, the judiciary will change, changes in the ECHR, yeterki you change, fate change, law of ram. One way to look at historical facts upuzun " Reaches maturity level of our democracy that can not be compared with the past should reach a point. Democracy, and any differences within the host is a system that tolerated. According to law, provided to show all the different opinions şartır tolerate.